A bad movie isn’t just a film that underwhelms—it’s a film that fundamentally misfires. Sometimes it’s death by a thousand cuts: a clunky screenplay weighed down by exposition, inconsistent directing choices that make the tone feel erratic, performances so stiff they might as well be AI-generated. Other times, the failure is structural, a film built on a concept that was never meant to hold its own weight. And yet, Hollywood keeps proving that dazzling visuals and inventive world-building can sometimes trick us—if only for a moment—into believing we’re watching something better than we are.
This is especially true in sci-fi and franchise filmmaking, where world-building is often the main attraction. These films rely on lore, expansive settings, and high-concept premises to draw audiences in, sometimes at the expense of character depth or narrative coherence. When the mechanics of a world—its politics, technology, mythology—are meticulously detailed, they can overshadow weak storytelling, creating the illusion of complexity where there is none. And because these genres often come with built-in fan bases and massive budgets, there’s an inherent pressure to prioritize spectacle over storytelling, leading to films that look incredible but feel hollow. These movies remind us that world-building can enhance a film, but it can’t carry it on its own.
That’s the thing about world-building: it’s a magician’s sleight of hand. It can mask incoherent plotting, distract from one-dimensional characters, and convince audiences that style is substance. It’s the reason we leave a theater thinking,Well, at least it looked cool. But no amount of grand-scale spectacle, multimillion-dollar CGI, or mythologically dense lore can truly fix a movie when the foundation is cracked. Whether it’s a gorgeous cyberpunk dystopia, a space opera buried under wooden dialogue, or a film so overstuffed with ambition that it collapses under its own weight, these are the movies that remind us that even the most breathtaking worlds can’t save a sinking ship.
15‘Tron: Legacy’ (2010)
tron legacy
A world where programs take humanoid form, where cities glow like electric temples, and where an arcade game can be a portal to another reality. With its sleek cyberpunk aesthetics, gravity-defying light cycle battles, and anall-timerelectronic score from Daft Punk,Tron: Legacycrafted a digital utopia (and dystopia) that felt like the future of blockbuster filmmaking. It wasn’t just a sequel to a cult film; it was an expansion, a meticulous reimagining of cyberspace as a place of rebellion, creation, and existential reckoning.
When Aesthetic Overpowers Storytelling
But for all its visual splendor,Tron: Legacyis an echo chamber of wasted potential. The screenplay is cold, bogged down by clunky exposition and a protagonist socharisma-deficient he makes the digitized Jeff Bridges (Kevin Flynn/CLU – Jeff Bridges)feel lifelike by comparison. Sam Flynn (Garrett Hedlund) is a black hole of personality, a generic hero wandering through a world infinitely more interesting than he is. Quorra (Olivia Wilde), a fascinating digital being with limitless potential, is reduced to a sidekick love interest, and the film’s central conflict—father and son reuniting inside a computer—lacks emotional stakes.
Tron: Legacywants to be a meditation on AI and free will but delivers dialogue so wooden it sounds AI-generated itself. The Grid is stunning, but like a high-end gaming PC with no software, it’s all hardware and no heart.
14‘Jupiter Ascending’ (2015)
Jupiter Ascending
A space opera where royalty is determined by DNA, where entire planets serve as mere resources for intergalactic elites, and where gravity boots allow for aerial ballet battles over Chicago,Jupiter Ascendinghad all the raw material for a grand sci-fi epic.
The Wachowskis, known for their ability to blend deep philosophy with maximalist action (The Matrix,Cloud Atlas), created a universe teeming with ideas: dynastic warfare among immortal elites, bureaucratic nightmares on a planetary scale, and a heroine (Mila Kunis) who unknowingly possesses ownership of Earth. The film is a sensory overload of opulent palaces, reptilian bounty hunters, and half-man, half-wolf soldiers brooding in the moonlight.
A Galaxy-Sized Mess of a Movie
Unfortunately,Jupiter Ascendingis a movie that suffocates under its own ambition. The script is an albatross—plot points are both convoluted and shallow, dialogue veers between nonsensical and unintentionally hilarious, and its protagonist, Jupiter Jones (Mila Kunis), spends most of the movie being kidnapped, rescued, and faintly confused about why any of this is happening. The film’s villain, Balem Abrasax (Eddie Redmayne), delivers every line like he’s just woken up from a coma, whispering through monologues with a kind of deranged campiness that would be brilliant if it were intentional.
Even Channing Tatum’s Caine Wise—half-albino wolf warrior with anti-gravity rollerblades—feels like an action figure concept that never made it past the prototype stage. The world-building is mesmerizing, but it serves a plot so structurally incoherent that it collapses under its own intergalactic weight.
Mila Kunis Says She Knew Jupiter Ascending Would Flop
Last minute budget cuts had Mila Kunis realizing before cameras even started to roll that Jupiter Ascending was destined for failure.
13‘Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets’ (2017)
Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets
A candy-colored space fantasy bursting with interdimensional markets, neon-drenched space stations, and a sprawling metropolis housing thousands of alien species,Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planetsis one of the most visually arresting sci-fi films ever made. Luc Besson, the mind behindThe Fifth Element, pulls from the legendary French comicValérian and Laureline, crafting a galaxy that feels alive—overflowing with creatures, cultures, and technological wonders. There’s a breathtaking opening sequence in which the titular Alpha City expands over centuries, forming a glittering hub of intergalactic diplomacy. The film brims with strange beauty: shape-shifting entertainers, utopian pearl-powered planets, and stunningly immersive CGI that makes every frame feel like a painting in motion.
A Black Hole of Chemistry and Storytelling
If only anyone cared about the actual story. The film’s biggest misstep is its casting—Valerian (Dane DeHaan) and Laureline (Cara Delevingne) share the chemistry of two strangers trapped in an elevator, which is unfortunate given that their banter-fueled romance is supposed to carry the emotional core of the movie. DeHaan, miscast as a roguish space agent, delivers every line with the enthusiasm of a man reading legal documents, and Delevingne, while charismatic, is given little to do beyond trading sarcastic remarks and being the far more competent half of the duo. Meanwhile, the plot—a weak conspiracy about stolen pearls and an intergalactic genocide—feels weightless, secondary to the visual spectacle.
Valerianis a testament to the idea thata fully realized universe doesn’t automatically result in an engaging film. It’s a masterpiece of aesthetics, but storytelling-wise, it’s an expensive fever dream that never wakes up.
12‘Mortal Engines’ (2018)
Mortal Engines
Mortal Enginesenvisions a world where entire cities have been mounted on massive, tank-like wheels, roaming the desolate wasteland in search of resources to consume. Based on Philip Reeve’s novel and produced by Peter Jackson, the film is packed with jaw-dropping spectacle—London, transformed into a monstrous, mobile metropolis, devouring smaller towns in a brutal display of municipal Darwinism; a ruined Earth filled with airborne pirate ships, underground resistance networks, and AI-controlled revenants.
Mortal Enginesis one of those rare films where every frame brims with intricate detail, crafting a world so rich in lore that it feels like it should bethenext big sci-fi franchise.
A City-Sized Misfire
And yet, no amount of visual ingenuity can mask the fact thatMortal Enginesis a disaster in almost every other way. Its characters feel plucked from a YA novel’s first draft—Hester Shaw (Hera Hilmar), the vengeful protagonist with a scar that’s downplayed into near-invisibility; Tom Natsworthy (Robert Sheehan), a bland historian inexplicably shoved into an action-hero role; and Thaddeus Valentine (Hugo Weaving), a villain so generic he could have been named “Evil McBadguy.”
The film’s exposition dumps are relentless, explaining world-building elements with all the grace of a Wikipedia entry, and the narrative moves with the urgency of a high-speed chase that somehow feels like a slog.Mortal Engineswants to beMad Max: Fury RoadmeetsStar Wars, but with no emotional core, its massive, moving cities collapse under their own weight.
10 Biggest Box Office Bombs of 2018
From Mortal Engines to Solo, studios took some mighty big swings and whiffed it several times out in 2018.
11‘Waterworld’ (1995)
Waterworld
An oceanic dystopia where Earth is submerged under rising seas,Waterworldimagines a future where floating scavenger cities rule the endless waves, where mutated gill-men swim beneath the surface, and where the search for the mythical “Dryland” has become the holy grail of civilization.
The film spares no expense in crafting a unique world: the Atoll, a makeshift trading hub built from centuries of wreckage; the Smokers, aMad Max-style pirate gang led by the absurdly entertaining Deacon (Dennis Hopper); and the Mariner (Kevin Costner), a lone wanderer whose half-amphibian genetics make him something more than human. The scale of the film is jaw-dropping, from massive action set pieces staged entirely on open water to the sheer ambition of building real floating sets instead of relying on CGI.
Drowning in Its Own Ambition
For all ofWaterworld’simmersive spectacle, it became infamous as one of Hollywood’s most notorious financial disasters—and for good reason. Its behind-the-scenes turmoil, spiraling costs, andKevin Costner’sownTitanic-sized ego plagued the production, but the real problem is its leaden storytelling. The Mariner is less of a protagonist and more of a wet blanket, grunting his way through a screenplay that seems to mistake brooding silence for depth.
The pacing is erratic, stretching a simple chase narrative into an overlong, meandering odyssey. And while its world is meticulously built, the film never quite explores its best ideas, reducing fascinating settings and characters to little more than set dressing. Like its waterlogged sets,Waterworldis ambitious, expensive, and ultimately left drifting without direction.
10‘The Chronicles of Riddick’ (2004)
The Chronicles of Riddick
The Chronicles of Riddickexpands the minimalist sci-fi horror ofPitch Blackinto an expansive mythos filled with necromonger warlords, prison planets bathed in deadly sunlight, and an outlaw antihero caught between destiny and self-preservation. The film introduces a staggering amount of world-building in a short span—an empire of death-obsessed conquerors, an ancient prophecy surrounding Riddick (Vin Diesel), and multiple planets with their own distinctive cultures and political conflicts. Every frame is filled with dense mythology, from the shadowy underworld of Helion Prime to the prison world of Crematoria, where the rising sun incinerates anything in its path.
Buried Under Its Own Lore
But whileThe Chronicles of Riddickdreams of beingDunemeetsConan the Barbarian, it often feels like a Wikipedia deep-dive into a franchise that doesn’t actually exist. It’s the kind of movie that throws around words like “Underverse” and “Furyan” as if the audience should already be familiar with them, stuffing itself with exposition while leaving its actual plot feeling thin.
Riddick himself, while a compelling presence, is weighed down by Vin Diesel’s monotone delivery, stripping the character of the mysterious menace he had inPitch Black. Meanwhile, the villains—the Necromongers, led by Lord Marshal (Colm Feore)—come across as overwrought, overdesigned, and yet oddly forgettable.The Chronicles of Riddickis a film that desperately wants to launch a multi-film saga, but its convoluted mythology and lack of narrative focus make it more of an overstuffed prologue to a franchise that never quite materialized.
9‘The Golden Compass’ (2007)
The Golden Compass
A world where souls take the form of talking animals, where an authoritarian church controls every aspect of knowledge, and where armored polar bears battle for dominance—The Golden Compassis one of the most richly imagined fantasy settings ever brought to the screen. Adapted from Philip Pullman’sHis Dark Materialstrilogy, the film presents a universe layered with deep mythology: dæmons, which serve as external manifestations of a person’s soul; the Magisterium, a sinister religious authority controlling human destiny; and the alethiometer, a mysterious device that reveals hidden truths.
Every detail—from the steampunk-inspired airships to the frostbitten tundras of Svalbard—feels meticulously crafted, and the film is visually stunning, capturing the grandeur of Pullman’s novels with remarkable precision.
An Adaptation Strangled by Its Own Fear
Yet,The Golden Compassis the kind of film that looks the part but never finds its soul. Plagued by studio interference and a desperate attempt to strip away the book’s anti-religious themes to avoid controversy, the adaptation feels like a hollowed-out version of Pullman’s vision. Lyra Belacqua (Dakota Blue Richards) is a strong protagonist on paper, but her journey is rushed and underdeveloped, flattening her rebellious spirit. The Magisterium, meant to be a chilling allegory for dogmatic control, becomes a generic villainous force with no real weight. Even the dæmons, a fascinating concept with deep emotional resonance, feel more like CGI gimmicks than integral parts of the characters.
The Golden Compasshad the world-building to launch the nextHarry Potter, but in sanding down its edges for mass appeal, it lost the very thing that made its story powerful.
The 10 Most Extravagant Film Sets Ever Built
These lavish and expensive set builds created environments to match the epic proportions of these cinematic stories.
8‘Bright’ (2017)
A buddy cop movie set in a world where magic exists alongside modern society,Brightenvisions an alternate Los Angeles where elves live in gated communities, orcs are a persecuted underclass, and ancient prophecies lurk in the margins of urban warfare. The film introduces an intriguing mash-up of fantasy and realism, where police corruption, racial allegories, and supernatural forces collide. The neon-lit streets of LA feel like they belong in both a crime drama and a high-fantasy epic, populated by gangland faeries, wand-wielding crime lords, and FBI agents specializing in magical terrorism. The concept alone makes it one of the most original urban fantasy settings in years.
A Missed Opportunity in Every Way
ButBrightis a film that squanders every inch of its potential. Instead of using its rich world to explore deeper themes, it clumsily shoehorns real-world racial tensions into an orc-versus-human metaphor that never quite works.
The script, penned by Max Landis, feels like a first draft of a much smarter movie, full of forced cop-movie clichés and painfully unnatural dialogue. Will Smith (Daryl Ward) and Joel Edgerton (Nick Jakoby) have moments of chemistry, buttheir partnership lacks depth, leaving the story feeling like a series of underwhelming action set piecesrather than a fully realized narrative. Meanwhile, Noomi Rapace’s Leilah, a supposedly terrifying dark elf villain, is so underdeveloped that she becomes just another forgettable antagonist in a film that should have felt revolutionary.Brighthad the world to tell an incredible story, but instead, it settled for mediocrity.
7‘Pacific Rim: Uprising’ (2018)
Pacific Rim: Uprising
A world where skyscraper-sized mechs battle interdimensional sea monsters, where pilots fuse their minds together to control robotic war machines, and where humanity’s survival depends on drifting into a synchronized consciousness—Pacific Rimcreated a universe unlike anything before it. The original film, directed by Guillermo del Toro, balanced its outrageous premise with a heartfelt love letter to kaiju cinema, crafting a world where giant robots weren’t just cool—they were a necessity. The lore was rich, filled with questions about the origins of the Kaiju, the mental strain of the Jaeger program, and the geopolitical landscape of a world under siege.
A Sequel with No Soul
Then camePacific Rim: Uprising, a sequel that understood none of what made the original special. Instead of weighty, operatic battles drenched in rain and neon, we got generic daylight action sequences with weightless CGI. Instead of strong character relationships, we got a bland, forced mentorship arc between Jake Pentecost (John Boyega) and Amara Namani (Cailee Spaeny), neither of whom are given enough development to be compelling. Even the Kaiju, once terrifying and awe-inspiring, are reduced to afterthoughts in a plot that revolves around rogue drones and a painfully generic villain. Del Toro’s world was built with love and reverence;Uprisingfeels like a studio-mandated cash grab that strippedPacific Rimof its grandiosity, its emotional stakes, and, most disappointingly, its heart.
6‘The Star Wars Prequel Trilogy’ (1999-2005)
Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
A galaxy of intergalactic politics, Jedi prophecy, and technological marvels, theStar Warsprequels expanded one of the most beloved cinematic universes, giving us a deeper look at the Republic’s fall and the rise of the Empire. The world-building in these films is nothing short of remarkable—lush city-planets like Coruscant, neon-lit crime hubs like Kamino, and mythic warrior cultures like the Mandalorians were all cemented intoStar Warslore. Lucas introduced the Jedi Order at its peak, filling the screen with new alien species, political intrigue, and deeper Force mythology. Even if the execution faltered, the prequels gave the franchise an ambitious, layered history that reshaped everything that followed.
A Galactic Failure in Execution
But for all the grand vision,The Phantom Menace,Attack of the Clones, andRevenge of the Sithstruggle under the weight of stiff performances, clunky dialogue, and an obsession with CGI that rendered the world plasticine and lifeless. The political drama—meant to add depth—becomes an endless parade of dry Senate meetings. Iconic characters like Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen) are flattened into awkward, wooden caricatures, and relationships—particularly Anakin and Padmé’s (Natalie Portman)—suffer from dialogue so stilted it has been memed into eternity.
Even the action sequences, while visually impressive, feel emotionally hollow. The prequels had the galaxy at their fingertips, but Lucas’s unchecked creative control resulted in films that felt more like digital tech demos than emotionally resonant storytelling.
The Good (and Not-So-Good) of Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith
The Star Wars prequels are a mixed bag, but Episode III - The Revenge of the Sith overcomes its flaws to be the best of the bunch.
